NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: People with Disabilities Australia Incorporated v Minister for Disability Services [2014] NSWSC 1669 Hearing dates: 23/08/2013 Decision date: 28 November 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: (1)Under Rule 13.4 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 the proceedings are summarily dismissed; (2)The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of and incidental to the proceedings on the usual basis forthwith after they have been agreed or assessed. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - application for summary dismissal of application for judicial review - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - judicial review - mandamus - where mandamus sought against minister for disability services to perform his duty under the Disability Services Act 1993 according to law - whether funding of certain style of housing for people suffering with disability not done in conformity with the objects of the act - whether "decision" amenable to judicial review - whether justiciable issue - whether attempt to engage court in merits review of ministerial policy decisions Legislation Cited: Disability Services Act 1993 (NSW) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Community Services (Complaints Reviews and Monitoring) Act 1993 Cases Cited: Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552 Attorney General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1 Corporation of the City of Einfeld v Development Assessment Commission: [2000] HCA 5; 199 CLR 135 Dey v Victorian Railway Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 Ex parte Cornford; re Minister for Education [1962] SR (NSW) 220 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Chevron USA Inc v Natural Resources Defense Council (1984) 467 US 837 Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2010] HCA 1; 239 CLR 531 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; 249 CLR 332 Mummery v Irvings Pty Ltd (1956) 96 CLR 99 Patsalis v New South Wales (2012) 81 NSWLR 742 People with Disability Australia Incorporated v Minister for Disability Services [2011] NSWCA 253 People with Disability Australia Incorporated v Minister for Disability Services [2013] NSWSC 467 Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 R v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis ex parte Blackburn [1968] 2 QB 118 R v Hickman; ex parte Fox & Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 R v The War Pensions Entitlement Appeal Tribunal; ex parte Bott (1933) 50 CLR 228 Sims v Wran [1984] 1 NSWLR 317 Spencer v The Commonwealth [2010] HCA 28; 241 CLR 118 Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England (No. 3) [2003] 2 AC 1 Zheng v Cai [2009] HCA 52; 239 CLR 446 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: People With Disability Australia Incorporated (Plaintiff) The Honourable Andrew Constance, Minister for Disability Services (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B Walker SC with R Francois (Plaintiff) J K Kirk SC with R Graycar (Defendant) Solicitors: Gilbert & Tobin (Plaintiff) Crown Solicitors Office (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/00381137
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate