NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: FB v R [2014] NSWCCA 282 Hearing dates: 27 August 2014 Decision date: 01 December 2014 Before: Leeming JA at [1] Adams J at [2] Fullerton J at [18] Decision: Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - appeal against sentence - whether sentence affected by Muldrock error - whether any lesser sentence is warranted - appeal following increase of sentence - nature of appeal Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61J Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 78, s 79(1)(b) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 54B(2), Div 1A Pt 4 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(3), s 51C Cases Cited: FB v R; R v FB [2011] NSWCCA 217 Louizos v R [2014] NSWCCA 242 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 Category: Principal judgment Parties: FB (Appellant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Barrow (Appellant) Ms S Dowling SC (Crown) Solicitors: Heffernan Legal (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2009/227215 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2010-11-11 00:00:00 Before: Lakatos DCJ File Number(s): 2009/227215
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate