NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Andrew Robert Stuart Johnson v Karen Elizabeth Smith and David Charles Johnson [2014] NSWSC 1682 Hearing dates: 8, 9, 10 September 2014 Decision date: 27 November 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Kunc J Decision: Additional provision ordered Catchwords: FAMILY PROVISION AND MAINTENANCE - Claim against mother's estate by adult son who had been dependent on parents his entire life - No issue of principle - Succession Act 2006, ss 59, 60 Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Camernik v Reholc [2012] NSWSC 1537 Frances Madge Johnson by her tutor Karen Elisabeth Smith v Andrew Robert Stuart Johnson [2009] NSWSC 503 Johnson v NSW Guardianship Tribunal and Ors [2009] NSWSC 664 Johnson v Smith [2010] NSWSC 125 Johnson v Smith [2010] NSWCA 306 Johnson v Smith & Anor [2011] HCASL 53 Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; (1998) 193 CLR 72 Smith v Johnson [2008] NSWSC 923 Verzar v Verzar [2014] NSWCA 45 Jacqueline May Isabella West v John Alexander Mann [2013] NSWSC 1852 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew Robert Stuart Johnson (Plaintiff) Karen Elizabeth Smith (First Defendant) David Charles Johnson (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C.M. Lawrence(Plaintiff) L.J. Ellison SC (Defendant) Solicitors: Mark Rahme & Associates (Plaintiff) Bognar Legal (Defendants) File Number(s): 2013/274991 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate