NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application by Malik Spania pursuant to s78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2014] NSWSC 1688 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 27 November 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL Decision: Application refused Catchwords: APPLICATION - application for inquiry into sentence pursuant to s78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 - whether doubt or question as to a mitigating circumstance - whether sentence infected by "Muldrock error" - offence of murder - guilty plea - "Muldrock error" did not arise in sentence judgment - no other mitigating circumstance raised - application refused. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 - s78(1), s79(3) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Application by Bill Bayeh under Section 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2012] NSWSC 1358 Application of Peter Holland [2001] NSWSC 251 Application of Rendell (1987) 32 A Crim R 243 Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (ACT) [2003] HCA 28; 214 CLR 318 Markarian v the Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Spania [2009] NSWSC 148 Sinkovich v Attorney General of NSW [2013] NSWCA 383 Varley v Attorney General (NSW) (1987) 8 NSWLR 30 at 48-50 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Malik Spania - Applicant Regina - Respondent Representation: Counsel: Solicitors: Kiki Kyraicou Lawyers - Applicant Crown Solicitor's Office - Respondent File Number(s): 2014/116847
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate