NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nicholas Polias v Tobin Ryall [2014] NSWSC 1692 Hearing dates: 07 October 2014 - 10 October 2014 Decision date: 28 November 2014 Before: Rothman J Decision: (1)Judgment for the plaintiff; (2)The first defendant shall pay the plaintiff damages in the sum of $125,000; (3)The second defendant shall pay the plaintiff damages in the sum of $130,000; (4)The third defendant shall pay the plaintiff damages in the sum of $50,000; (5)The fourth defendant shall pay the plaintiff damages in the sum of $35,000; (6)The parties have liberty to address on interest and costs on a date to be set; (7)The plaintiff to provide a Short Minutes of Order to reflect judgment in accordance with these reasons within 14 days of the date hereof. Catchwords: DEFAMATION - allegation of theft - only issue was substantial truth - factual determination - no issue of principle Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 Cases Cited: Ali v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 183 Amalgamated Television Services v Marsden (1998) 43 NSWLR 158 Associated Newspaper v Dingle [1964] AC 371 Carson v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1993] HCA 31; (1993) 178 CLR 44 Chappel v Mirror Newspapers Ltd (NSWCA 14 June 1984, unreported) Crampton v Nugawela (1996) 41 NSWLR 176 David v Abdishou [2012] NSWCA 109 Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick [2002] HCA 56; (2002) 210 CLR 575 Haddon v Forsyth [2011] NSWSC 123 Holt v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 90; (2014) 86 NSWLR 96 Ley v Hamilton (1935) 153 LT 384 Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons [2001] HCA 69; (2001) 208 CLR 388 Phillips v Robab [2014] NSWSC 1520 Rastogi v Nolan [2010] NSWSC 735 Reader's Digest Services Pty Ltd v Lamb [1982] HCA 4; (1982) 150 CLR 500 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nicholas Polias (Plaintiff) Tobin Ryall (First Defendant) Andy Hun Wei Lee (Second Defendant) Sandy Jan (Third Defendant) Rhys Gould (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: S. Chrysanthou/with B. Regener (Plaintiff) M. Rollinson (First, Second, Third and Fourth Defendants) Solicitors: Kalantzis Lawyers (Plaintiff) Phoenix Attorneys (First Defendant) BPH Legal (Second and Third Defendants) File Number(s): 2013/161335 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate