NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ivan Petch v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2014] NSWSC 1693 Hearing dates: 22 October 2014 - 23 October 2014 Decision date: 28 November 2014 Before: Rothman J Decision: (1)Judgment for the first defendant (ICAC); (2)Save for the issues raised in the motion filed on 20 November 2014, and otherwise subject to leave granted herein, the summons is dismissed; (3)The plaintiff shall pay the first defendant's costs of and incidental to the proceedings as agreed or assessed; (4)Liberty to apply for special or different orders as to costs to both parties within 7 days of the publication of the reasons for judgment. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - challenge to findings of ICAC - "insufficiency of evidence" - illogicality and irrationality - satisfaction of decision maker required, not objective existence of circumstances - summons dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Election Funding, Expenditure and Disclosures Act 1981 Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 Local Government Act 1993 Cases Cited: A v Hayden (1984) 156 CLR 532 AG Australia Holdings Ltd v Burton [2002] NSWSC 170; (2002) 58 NSWLR 464 Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin [1990] HCA 21; (1990) 170 CLR 1 Australian Postal Commission v Hayes (1989) 23 FCR 320 Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; (1938) 60 CLR 336 Carr v Baker (1936) 36 SR (NSW) 301 Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission [2000] HCA 5; (2000) 199 CLR 135 Craig v State of South Australia [1995] HCA 58; (1995) 184 CLR 163 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; (2000) 205 CLR 337 Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy [2002] HCA 51; (2002) 210 CLR 438 Initial Services Ltd v Putterill [1968] 1 QB 396 FTZK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] HCA 26; (2014) 88 ALJR 754 Gedeon v Commissioner of the New South Wales Crime Commission; Dowe v Commissioner of NSW Crime Commission [2008] HCA 43; (2008) 236 CLR 120 Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission (NSW); Kirk Group Holdings Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority of (NSW) [2010] HCA 1; (2010) 239 CLR 531 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; (2010) 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration & Citizenship v SZOCT [2010] FCAFC 159; (2010) 189 FCR 577 MZXSA v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCAFC 123 Swift v SAS Trustee Corporation [2010] NSWCA 182 SZMWQ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCAFC 97; (2010) 187 FCA 109 SZOOR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCAFC 58; (2012) 202 FCR 1Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte [1938] HCA 7; (1938) 59 CLR 369 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 335 QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd v Miller [2013] NSWCA 442 QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd v Motor Accidents Authority (NSW) & Ors [2013] NSWSC 549 R v Quach [2010] VSCA 106; (2010) 201 A Crim R 522 Rawson Finances Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2013] FCAFC 26 Savita Singh v Motor Accidents Authority [2010] NSWSC 550 TA Miller Ltd v Minister for Housing and Local Government [1968] 1 WLR 992 Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL & Ors [1999] NSWCA 8; (1999) 46 NSWLR 55 Tisdall v Webber [2011] FCAFC 76; (2011) 193 FCR 260 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ivan Petch (Plaintiff) Independent Commission Against Corruption (First Defendant) The Honourable Paul Toole, MP, Minister for Local Government (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J. Hyde/with L.Chan (Plaintiff) A. Mitchelmore (First Defendant) Z. Heger (Second Defendant) Solicitors: Moray & Agnew Lawyers (Plaintiff) NSW Crown Solicitor's Office (First and Second Defendant) File Number(s): 2014/00219874 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate