NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: W v H [2014] NSWSC 1696 Hearing dates: 16 November 2014 Decision date: 28 November 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Protective List Before: Lindsay J (in chambers) Decision: Orders made approving a family settlement relating to management and disposition of property of a protected person Catchwords: SUCCESSION - Wills, Probate and Administration - Protective jurisdiction - Allowance of provision for family out of protected estate - Statutory will - Approval of family settlement - Principles applicable
MENTAL HEALTH - Guardians, committees, administrators, managers and receivers - Management and administration of property - Allowance of provision for family out of protected estate - Approval of family settlement - Principles applicable
PRACTICE - NSW Trustee and Guardian Act - Management and administration of property - Allowance of provision for family out of protected estate - Approval of family settlement - Material considerations Legislation Cited: NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 NSW Guardianship Act 1987 NSW Succession Act 2006 NSW Cases Cited: Ability One Financial Management Pty Limited and Anor v JB by his tutor AB [2014] NSWSC 245 at [143]-[149] and [151]-[154]) Andrew v Andrew (2012) 81 NSWLR 656 E (Mrs) v Eve (aka Re Eve) [1986] 2 SCR 388 at 407 and 410; 31 DLR (4th) 1 at 14 and 16 Estate Kouvakas; Lucas v Konakas [2014] NSWSC 786 at [134]-[144] and [258 Estate of Scott; Re Application for Probate [2014] NSWSC 465 at [104]-[108] Ex parte Whitbread (1816) 2 Mer 99; 35 ER 878 Ex parte Whitbread in the Matter of Hinde, a Lunatic (1816) 2 Mer 99; 35 ER 878 Griffin v Union Trustee Co of Australia Limited (1947) 48 SR (NSW) 360 at 363; 65 WN (NSW) 5 at 7 Griffin v Union Trustee Company of Australia Limited (1947) 48 SR (NSW) 360 at 363 and 365; 65 WN (NSW) 5 at 7 and 8 Holt v Protective Commissioner (1993) 31 NSWLR 227 at 238D and 241G-242A In re Darling (a person of unsound mind) (1888) 39 ChD 208 In re Evans (a person of unsound mind) (1882) 21 ChD 297 In the Matter of Blair, a Lunatic (1836) 1 My&Cr 300 at 302-303; 40 ER 390 at 391 In the Matter of Thomas, a Lunatic (1846) 2 Ph 169; 41 ER 906 M v M [2013] NSWSC 1495 at [50](a) - (d Osborne v Smith (1960) 105 CLR 153 at 158-159 PB v BB [2013] NSWSC 1223 at [27]-[30], [34], [38] and [56] Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales (1962) 107 CLR 9 at 19-20 Protective Commissioner v D (2004) 60 NSWLR 513 at 540 [149]-542(156), 543 [165] -[166] and 544 [171]-545 [173] Re DJR and the Mental Health Act 1958 [1983] 1 NSWLR 557 at 564E-G; Re ES and the Mental Health Act 1958 [1984] 3 NSWLR 341 at 343B-344D Re Eve [1986] 2 SCR 388 at 409-411 and 425-427; 31 DLR (4th) 1 at 16-17 and 28-29 Re Fenwick (2009) 76 NSWLR 22 at [170]-[176] Scott v Scott [2012] NSWSC 1541; 7 ASTLR 299 at [287] Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services v K [2014] NSWSC 1065 Secretary, Department of Health and Community Services v JWB and SWB (Marion's Case) (1992) 175 CLR 218 at 258 Szozda v Szozda [2010] NSWSC 804 Texts Cited: Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford University Press, 2004), pp 220-221 HS Theobold, The Law Relating to Lunacy (Stevens & Sons, London, 1924) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Locally-based son/manager of protected person First Defendant: Partner of protected person Second Defendant: Family company of plaintiff/lender to protected person Third Defendant: NSW Trustee and Guardian Fourth Defendant: Step-daughter of protected person Fifth Defendant: Queensland-based son of protected person Sixth Defendant: UK-based son of protected person Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: TD Castle First Defendant: G Sirtes SC and NCT Bilinsky Second Defendant: mentioned by plaintiff Third Defendant : - Fourth Defendant: C Birtles, solicitor Fifth Defendant : mentioned by plaintiff Sixth Defendant : mentioned by plaintiff Solicitors: Plaintiff: Elliot Tuthill First Defendant: Broun Abrahams Burreket Second Defendant: Pikes & Verekers Lawyers Third Defendant: NSW Trustee & Guardian (Attention Catherine Phang) Fourth Defendant: Teece Hodgson & Ward Fifth Defendant: Atwood Marshall Sixth Defendant: Hayden Fowler Corbett Jessop File Number(s): 2014/00148579
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate