NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: JR Consulting & Drafting Pty Ltd & Anor v Cummings & Ors [2014] NSWSC 1700 Hearing dates: 22 October 2014 Decision date: 01 December 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Black J Decision: Parties directed to provide agreed orders to Associate to Black J by 4pm on 8 December 2014 and, if there is any disagreement between them, their respective draft orders and short submissions as to the differences between them. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - judgments and orders - disputed issues remaining before orders can be made to give effect to primary judgment in proceedings - declaratory and injunctive relief - discretionary considerations - whether declarations sought have sufficient practical utility - whether declarations would quell present controversy despite potentially leaving some further issues unresolved - whether declarations sought are merely prefatory to order for damages - whether court should grant injunctive relief sought by cross-claimants - orders for disclosure - whether court should grant disclosure of relevant information to cross-claimants to facilitate election between alternative remedies - whether disclosure of third party information should be granted on Norwich Pharmacal basis - whether inquiry into damages should be made - whether third cross-defendant should be ordered to deliver up embodiment of relevant software in its possession. Legislation Cited: - Australian Consumer Law s 236 - Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works 1887 Art 2 - Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ss 115(2), 196, 196(2)(b), 196(4) - Copyright Act 1994 (NZ) - Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) ss 66, 75 - Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth) - WIPO Copyright Treaty 1996 Cases Cited: - Attorney-General (NSW); Ex rel Corporate Affairs v Australian Softwood Forest Pty Ltd [1979] 2 NSWLR 73 - Bondi Beach Astra Retirement Village Pty Ltd v Hohman [2010] NSWSC 260 - Breen v Williams [1996] HCA 57; (1996) 186 CLR 71 - Cypjayne Pty Ltd v Rodskog [2009] NSWSC 301 - Computershare Ltd v Perpetual Registrars Ltd [2000] VSC 139; (2000) 1 VR 626 - E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] FCAFC 47 - Forty Two International Pty Ltd v Barnes (No 2) [2011] FCA 210 - Hooper v Kirella Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1584; (1999) 96 FCR 1 - Integrated Lighting & Ceilings Pty Ltd v Philips Electrical Pty Ltd (1969) 90 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 693 - Irawan v AWB Ltd [2001] VSC 374 - McCausland v Surfing Hardware International Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 163 - Neeta (Epping) Pty Ltd v Phillips [1974] HCA 18; (1974) 131 CLR 286 - Nokia Corporation v Truong [2005] FCA 1141; (2005) 66 IPR 511 - Norwich Pharmacal Co v Commissioners of Customs and Excise [1974] AC 133. - Painaway Australia Pty Ltd v JAKL Group Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 205; (2011) 249 FLR 1 - QS Holdings Sarl v Paul's Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 1038 - Redland Bricks Ltd v Morris [1970] AC 652 - Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltd v Global Pharmaceutics Ltd [1986] RPC 394 - Trans Realties Pty Ltd v Grbac [1975] 1 NSWLR 170 Texts Cited: - RP Meagher, JD Heydon and MJ Leeming, Meagher Gummow & Lehane's Equity Doctrines and Remedies, (4th ed 2002, Butterworths LexisNexis) - PW Young, Declaratory Orders, (2nd ed 1984, Butterworths) - PW Young, C Croft and ML Smith, On Equity, (2009, Lawbook Co) Category: Consequential orders Parties: JR Consulting & Drafting Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Hayes Steel Framing Systems Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant) Robert Cummings (First Defendant) Tanmari Pty Ltd (Second Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) FrameCAD IP Ltd (Third Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Steel Framing Systems International Pty Ltd (Third Cross-Defendant) Gianni Pacione (otherwise known as John Pacione) (Fourth Cross-Defendant) FrameCAD Ltd (Fifth Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: T Catanzariti (Plaintiffs/First to Fourth Cross-Defendants) S J Goddard SC/S L Ross (Defendants/Cross-Claimants) Solicitors: Simone Legal (Plaintiffs/First to Fourth Cross-Defendants) Sparke Helmore (Defendants/Cross-Claimants) File Number(s): 2012/282948
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate