NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: OXS Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority and Minister for Planning and Environment [2014] NSWSC 1702 Hearing dates: 15 - 18 and 22 July 2014 (main hearing),9 September 2014 (directions hearing as to orders), 5 November 2014 (hearing as to costs) Decision date: 01 December 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Black J Decision: Plaintiff to pay the first defendant's costs of proceedings, as agreed or as assessed Catchwords: PROCEDURE - costs - general rule that costs follow the event - whether reason shown to depart from general rule - whether plaintiff is entitled to Bullock order against first defendant in respect of its costs liability to second defendant. Legislation Cited: - Australian Consumer Law - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 98 - Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW) - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 42.1, 42.20, 42.34, Cases Cited: - Alltrans Express Ltd v CVA Holdings Ltd [1984] 1 All ER 685 - Anglo-Cyprian Trade Agencies Ltd v Paphos Wine Industries Ltd [1951] 1 All ER 873 - Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 304 - Bullock v London General Omnibus Company [1907] 1 KB 264 - Corbett Court Pty Ltd v Quasar Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1423 - Franklins Pty Ltd v Metcash Trading Ltd [2009] NSWCA 407; (2009) 76 NSWLR 603 - Gould v Vaggelas [1985] HCA 85; (1984) 157 CLR 215 - King v Benecke [2014] NSWSC 957 - Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; (1998) 193 CLR 72 - Re Cheal Industries Pty Ltd; Fitzpatrick v Cheal [2012] NSWSC 932 - Re Colorado Products Pty Ltd (in prov liq) [2014] NSWSC 1509 - Re Lorie Najjar and Sons Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 9) [2014] NSWSC 56 Category: Costs Parties: OXS Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority (First Defendant) Minister for Planning and Environment (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A A Henskens SC/A Zahra (Plaintiff); A Mutton (directions hearing as to orders) B J Carruthers/B E M Anniwell (First Defendant) S Free (Second Defendant) Solicitors: Andrews & Holm Lawyers (Plaintiff) Ashurst Australia (First Defendant) Crown Solicitor's Office (Second Defendant) File Number(s): 2014/55365
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate