NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Liles v R (Cth) [2014] NSWCCA 289 Hearing dates: 29.10.2014 Decision date: 03 December 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] R A Hulme J at [61] Davies J at [62] Decision: (1) The sentences imposed by Schmidt J on 18 October 2012 are quashed. (2) In lieu thereof the applicant is sentenced as follows: (i) In respect of Count 1 a sentence of imprisonment for 1 year and 7 months commencing 18 October 2012 and expiring 17 May 2014. (ii) In respect of Count 2 a sentence of imprisonment for 1 year and 7 months commencing 18 May 2014 and expiring 17 December 2015. (iii) In respect of Count 3 a sentence of imprisonment for 4 months commencing 18 January 2015 and expiring 17 May 2015. (iv) In respect of Count 4 a sentence imprisonment for 3 years and 2 months commencing 18 May 2015 and expiring 17 July 2018. (3) The offender is to be released on 17 April 2016 upon entering a recognizance to be of good behaviour during the balance of the term of imprisonment without lodging cash security. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - two counts of conspiracy to defraud Commonwealth and two counts of conspiring to dishonestly cause a loss to the Commonwealth - a further conspiracy dealt with by way of a schedule - accountant engaged in a tax avoidance scheme - offending objectively serious - offender aged 65 and suffering from significant physical disabilities - whether offences on schedule properly taken into account - whether adequate regard had to the principle of equal justice - need to re-sentence - whether offender's medical conditions adequately treated in gaol - re-exercise of sentencing discretion - need to take into account offender's present medical condition - sentence reduced. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Baxter v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 237; 173 A Crim R 284 Douar v The Queen [2005] NSWCCA 455; 159 A Crim R 154 Hili v R; Jones v R [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37 R v Boughen; R v Cameron [2012] NSWCCA 17 R v Liles [2012] NSWSC 1249 R v Ronen [2006] NSWCCA 123; 161 A Crim R 300 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lynette Kathleen Liles - Applicant Regina (Cth) - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr T Game SC/Ms J Roy - Applicant Mr P Neil SC/Mr A McGrath - Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate