NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v Stojcevski [2014] NSWSC 1718 Hearing dates: 24, 25 and 26 November 2014 Decision date: 03 December 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: 1. Dismiss the cross-claim. 2. Order that, unless any party makes an application in writing to my Associate within seven days, the cross-claimant pay the cross-defendant's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: TORTS - professional negligence - cross-claim against solicitor - cross-claimant husband and wife received legal advice from cross-defendant in relation to signing a loan agreement and mortgage - solicitor was not obliged to advise husband to obtain independent advice - mere fact that the solicitor had been told two years previously that parties were separated did not give rise to a duty to interrogate clients about the state of their marriage - parties living separately for benefit of son - joint loan secured over joint property for apparently mutual benefit
LIMITATION OF ACTIONS -causes of action statute-barred
DAMAGES - no proper evidence to make findings on the calculation of damages - loan increased by unrelated refinance - quantum of benefit retained by cross-claimant from loan unclear - costs of retaining a handwriting claimed by cross-claimant were incurred as a result of the cross-claimant's false instructions to solicitor Legislation Cited: Consumer Credit (New South Wales) Code 1995 (NSW), s 80 Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 35 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 57 Cases Cited: Forster v Outred & Co. [1982] 1 WLR 86 Hawkins v Clayton (1988) 164 CLR 539 Wardley Australia Limited v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Perpetual Trustee Company Limited (Plaintiff) Branko Stojcevski (First Defendant/ Cross Claimant) Lesley Alexandra Stojcevski (Second Defendant) Frank Mathey (Cross Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Wilson (Cross Claimant) AR Zahra (Cross Defendant) Solicitors: RMB Lawyers (Cross Claimant) Sparke Helmore (Cross Defendant) File Number(s): 2013/60807 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate