NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tripod Funds Management Pty Ltd v Shao [2014] NSWSC 1722 Hearing dates: 28 November 2014 Decision date: 28 November 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Rein J Decision: Motion granted. Catchwords: EQUITY - Interlocutory application - motion for summary dismissal - where an order for security for costs has been made - where the plaintiff has failed to pay security - where the plaintiff has provided no evidence of ability to provide security - where there is prejudice to the defendant Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: Ballard v Brookfield [2013] NSWCA 82 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor [1996] HCA 25; (1996) 186 CLR 541 First Tiffany Resource Corporation v Hill End Gold Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1713 Idoport Pty Limited v National Australia Bank [2002] NSWCA 271 In the matter of AAMAC Warehousing and Transport Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2014] NSWSC 834 Porter v Gordian Runoff No 3 [2005] NSWCA 377 Re Clarecastle Pty Limited [2011] NSWSC 857 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Tripod Funds Management (Plaintiff) Helen Shao (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Psaltis (solicitor) (Plaintiff) D Krochmalik (Defendant)
Solicitors: Mercantile Legal Services (Plaintiff) Levitt Robinson Solicitors (Defendant) File Number(s): 2014/218678
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate