NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nand v R [2014] NSWCCA 293 Hearing dates: 9 October 2014 Decision date: 05 December 2014 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] Schmidt J at [2] Bellew J at [101] Decision: Leave to appeal be granted but the appeal be dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - two offences of sexual intercourse without consent - whether sentences were severe and manifestly excessive - applicant unrepresented - whether false advice was received from incompetent legal representatives - whether expert medical report tendered by defence were not considered by sentencing judge - whether sexual abuse inflicted upon the applicant during childhood was not adequately taken into account by sentencing judge - leave to appeal be granted but appeal be dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Dousha v R [2008] NSWCCA 263 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; (2006) 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; 49 NSWLR 383 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Avineshwar Nand (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: Ms V Lydiard (Crown) Solicitors: Mr A Nand, self-represented J Pheils, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2010/417819 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2012-06-29 00:00:00 Before: Judge S Norrish QC File Number(s): 2010/417819
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate