NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Arentz v Workers' Compensation (Dust Diseases) Board [2014] NSWDC 205 Hearing dates: 6 June 2014 Decision date: 15 August 2014 Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: Appeal allowed Catchwords: DAMAGES - STATUTORY COMPENSATION - Double recovery - Plaintiff obtained damages in a common law action against non-employer tortfeasor pursuant to settlement - Pursues claim for statutory benefits from the Dust Diseases Board - Settlement amount did not apportion between economic loss and medical expenses and general damages - Whether statutory claim breaches principle against double compensation Legislation Cited: Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 Victims Compensation Act 1996 Workers Compensation (Dust Diseases) Act 1942 Cases Cited: Amaca Pty Ltd v King [2011] VSCA 447 CSR Ltd v D'Arcy (1996) 40 NSWLR 721 Downes v Amaca Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 76; (2010) 9 DDCR 432 James Hardie and Co Pty Ltd v Newton (1997) 42 NSWLR 729 SAS Trustee Corporation v Budd [2005] NSWCA 366; (2005) 3 DDCR 382 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Leonard David Arentz Workers' Compensation (Dust Diseases) Board Representation: Solicitors Maurice Blackburn (Plaintiff) Catherine Morgan (Defendant) Counsel Mr D Russell SC (Plaintiff) Mr J Sheller (Defendant) File Number(s): RJ64/14 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate