NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v IL (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 1733 Hearing dates: 3 December 2014 Decision date: 03 December 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: Application for adjournment refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - adjournment - discharge of jury - application for adjournment after ruling that no evidence support some counts on the indictment - application requiring discharge of jury - application to enable appeal against acquittal in circumstances where no interlocutory appeal available - decision said to be relevant to "other cases in the pipeline" - no details of other cases provided or known - delays in trial - expense - accused entitled to verdicts on other counts on indictment - accused on stringent bail condition for two years - suggestion that accused not prejudiced rejected - no prejudice to prosecution in remaining charges going to verdict Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) Cases Cited: R v IL (No 2) (2014) NSWSC 1710 R v Lethlean (1985) 53 A Crim R 197 R v Cheng (1998) 48 NSWLR 616 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Crown IL (Accused) Representation: Counsel: R Herps (Crown) R Pontello (Accused)
Solicitors: DPP (Crown) The Defenders (Accused) File Number(s): 2012/3683 Publication restriction: Non-publication of any matter that may lead to the identification of the accused (Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 111(1)(b))
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate