NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Citadel Financial Corporation Pty Ltd v Elite Highrise Services Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1750 Hearing dates: 4 December 2014 Date of orders: 04 December 2014 Decision date: 04 December 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Brereton J Decision: Order 3 of 3 December 2014 varied. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – amendment of orders – whether amendment would involve jeopardy to the purchaser or receiver. Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Citadel Financial Corporation Pty Limited ACN 106 654 844 (plaintiff/respondent) Elite Highrise Services Pty Limited (Receivers and managers appointed) ACN 155 992 573 (first defendant/applicant) Murray Roderick Godfrey and David Nicholas Iannuzzi in their capacity as receivers and managers of Elite Highrise Services Pty Limited (receivers and managers appointed) ACN 155 992 573 (second defendant/applicant) CML Payroll Pty Limited ACN 150 688 476 (third defendant) Skyline Apartments Pty Limited ACN 001 451 332 and Pacific Hoardings Pty Limited ACN 134 060 950 (fourth defendant/respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Somerville (plaintiff/respondent) B Sewell (solicitor) (second defendant/applicant) R McGrath (solicitor) (fourth defendant/respondent)
Solicitors: Bridges Lawyers (plaintiff/respondent) Sewell & Kettle (second defendant/applicant) McGrath Solicitors (fourth defendant/respondent) File Number(s): 2013/372920
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate