NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Liverpool City Council v Maller Holdings Pty Ltd trading as Sydney Horse Transport [2014] NSWCCA 299 Hearing dates: 15 October 2014 Decision date: 11 December 2014 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Fullerton J at [51]; Bellew J at [52] Decision: (1) The Court answers in the affirmative Questions 1 and 2 of the Stated Case, and answers Question 3 "Does not arise". (2) The Court orders that the proceedings be remitted to the Land and Environment Court for resolution in accordance with those answers. Catchwords: LAND AND ENVIRONMENT - case stated by Land and Environment Court to Court of Criminal Appeal - development consents granted under previously operative environmental planning instruments authorised use of subject property for "stables" - respondent charged with using property for purpose not authorised under the current instrument of conducting horse transport business - whether use of property for horse transport business was authorised by historic consents - whether charge was defeated by authorisation of part of actual use of property - authorised use of stabling did not cover whole of use to which property was put Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5AE Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), ss 4, 76A, 76B, 76C, 109B Local Government Act 1919 (NSW) Cases Cited: Abret Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2011] NSWCA 107; 180 LGERA 343 Bardsley-Smith v Penrith City Council [2013] NSWCA 200; 195 LGERA 34 Baulkham Hills Shire Council v O'Donnell (1990) 69 LGRA 404 Botany Bay City Council v Pet Carriers International Pty Ltd [2013] NSWLEC 147; 201 LGERA 116 Chamwell Pty Ltd v Strathfield Council [2007] NSWLEC 114; 151 LGERA 400 Foodbarn Pty Ltd v Solicitor-General (1975) 32 LGRA 157 Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council v Geoffrey Twibill & Associates (1979) 39 LGRA 154 North Sydney Municipal Council v Boyts Radio and Electrical Pty Ltd (1998) 16 NSWLR 50 Royal Agricultural Society of New South Wales v Sydney City Council (1987) 61 LGRA 305 Shire of Perth v O'Keefe [1964] HCA 37; 110 CLR 529 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Liverpool City Council (Appellant/Prosecutor) Maller Holdings Pty Ltd trading as Sydney Horse Transport (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Galasso SC (Appellant/Prosecutor) I Hemmings SC (Respondent) Solicitors: Hones La Hood (Appellant/Prosecutor) Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/4774 Decision under appeal Citation: Liverpool City Council v Maller Holdings Pty Limited [2013] NSWLEC 154 Date of Decision: 2013-09-19 00:00:00 Before: Pain J File Number(s): LEC 2012/50757
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate