NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Saba v Moit Projects [2014] NSWSC 1759 Hearing dates: 02/12/2104 and 03/12/2014 Decision date: 03 December 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Commercial List Before: McDougall J Decision: Plaintiff to have judgment against second defendants for $260,000 and interest. Second defendants to pay plaintiff's costs on ordinary basis. Catchwords: BANKING AND FINANCE - instruments - cheques - whether cheque was filled up with authority -where inchoate instrument handed over to real estate agent - where real estate agent filled up cheque - where cheque then delivered for payment of deposit on purchase of real property- BANKING AND FINANCE - instruments - cheques - whether cheque was delivered conditionally - where conditions communicated to real estate agent not payee - whether payee was informed of conditions - whether conditions required to be satisfied if payee not aware of conditions - whether communicated conditions were satisfied before cheque was presented PROCEDURE - costs - departing from the general rule - whether to make order for costs on indemnity basis - where offer of compromise made close to hearing date - where offer only compromised claim as to interest amount - whether reasonable not to accept offer - whether court should otherwise order Legislation Cited: Cheques Act 1986 (Cth) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Cases Cited: Boulas v Angelopoulos (1991) 5 BPR 11477 Spalla v St George Wholesale Finance Pty Ltd (1999) 95 FCR 359 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kerry Ann Saba (Plaintiff) Moit Projects (St Leonards) Pty Limited (First Defendant) Jialiang Chen and Li Jiang trading as Metroestate Group (Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Colliers International (NSW) Pty Limited (First Cross-Defendant) Jonathan Canvan (Second Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Anderson (Plaintiff) M J Lewis (Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Solicitors: F C Bryant Thomas & Co (Plaintiff) Whitfields Solicitors (Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant) File Number(s): 2013/175721
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate