NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Harris v Harris [2014] NSWSC 1766 Hearing dates: 28 November 2014 Decision date: 11 December 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Rein J Decision: See [26]. Catchwords: EQUITY - Property - Application under section 66G of the Conveyancing Act - Application for appointment of trustees of sale prior to final hearing - Where the party resisting sale contends that the co-owner holds his share of the property on trust for the party resisting sale - Where the defendant seeks to obtain by way of interlocutory application the final relief sought in his cross-claim Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Cases Cited: Callaghan v O'Neill [2002] NSWSC 877 Juratowitch v Quitlong [2012] NSWSC 1374 Pascoe v Dyason [2011] NSWSC 1217 Payne v Rowe [2012] NSWSC 685 Re Fettell (1952) 52 SR (NSW) 227 Re McNamara and the Conveyancing Act (1961) 78 WN (NSW) 1068 Ryan v Dries [2002] NSWCA 3 Segal v Barel [2013] NSWCA 92; 84 NSWLR 193 Stone v Stone [2014] NSWSC 1655 Tory v Tory [2007] NSWSC 1078 Trustees of the Property of Zoltan Sandor, a bankrupt v Ramirez [1999] NSWCA 261 Williams v Legg (1993) 29 NSWLR 678 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Lesley Harris (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Michael Anthony Harris (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: R W Tregenza (Plaintiff) J S Drummond (Defendant) Solicitors: Tsolakis Solicitors (Plaintiff) Heckenberg Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2013/378863
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate