NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gearbox Solutions Pty Ltd v Bougoukas [2014] NSWCATAP 105 Hearing dates: 21 November 2014 Decision date: 10 December 2014 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: A P Coleman SC, Senior Member C Paull, Senior Member Decision: 1. Application for Leave to Appeal refused; 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: LEGAL REPRESENTATION: whether leave to represent party in Appeal Panel hearing necessary; discretion to allow party to be legally represented; whether unfair to respondent; issues not complex; leave refused. BIAS: whether apprehended bias because leave for legal representation refused; application to disqualify rejected. APPEAL: Leave to appeal; questions of fact; no questions of law; no other basis for leave; leave refused. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; (2000) 205 CLR 337 at [6]; Michael Wilson & Partners Limited v Nicholls [2011] HCA 48; (2011) 244 CLR 427; Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17; Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69; Agrison Pty Ltd v Madsen [2014] NSWCATAP 95 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gearbox Solutions Pty Ltd (Appellant) Michael Bougoukas (Respondent) File Number(s): AP 14/46444 Publication restriction: NIL Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 150003 Date of Decision: 2014-05-26 00:00:00 Before: D Turley, Member File Number(s): MV 14/15037
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate