NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application by Roseanne Beckett pursuant to s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2014] NSWSC 1773 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 12 December 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Davies J Decision: Application refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application for referral to the Court of Criminal Appeal pursuant to s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 - whether doubt or question as to conviction - prior application and prior petition - multiple convictions - all but 2 convictions earlier quashed by Court of Criminal Appeal - fabricated evidence by prosecuting officer - whether remaining convictions affected by the same wrongdoing - issue already considered by Court of Criminal Appeal - further evidence - whether sufficient to raise a doubt - application refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Cases Cited: Application of Peter James Holland under s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2008] NSWSC 251 Beckett v The State of New South Wales (No. 1) [2011] NSWSC 818 R v Catt (1993) 68 A Crim R 189 R v Catt [2005] NSWCCA 279 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Roseanne Beckett (Applicant) The State of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: On the papers Solicitors: Pagano Burlovich Lawyers (Applicant) Crown Solicitors Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 2008/11367
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate