NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: DA v R [2014] NSWCCA 306 Hearing dates: 12 September 2014 Decision date: 12 December 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Fullerton J at [2]; Hamill J at [3]. Decision: (1) Application for leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCE APPEAL - young offender - intellectual disability - ADHD - relevance to sentence - whether judge erred in failing to take into account in assessing moral culpability - absence of direct evidence before District Court - whether judge erred in drawing inferences from agreed facts Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: R v Elliot and Blessington [2006] NSWCCA 305; 164 A Crim R 208 R v Israil [2002] NSWCCA 255 Slade v The Queen [2005] NZCA 19 Category: Principal judgment Parties: DA (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Bruce (Applicant) T Smith (Respondent)
Solicitors: Aboriginal Legal Service (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2013/59027 Publication restriction: Suppression of the name of the accused and co-offenders Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 01 November 2013 Before: Wells DCJ File Number(s): 2013/59027
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate