NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lay v R [2014] NSWCCA 310 Hearing dates: 12/09/2014 Decision date: 19 December 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Fullerton J at [2]; Hamill J at [76] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - attempt to possess commercial quantity of heroin - guilty plea - parity Legislation Cited: Criminal Code (Cth), ss 11.1, 307.5(1) Customs Act 1901 (Cth), s 233B Cases Cited: Aoun v R [2011] NSWCCA 284 Baxter v R [2007] NSWCCA 237; 173 A Crim R 284 Gill v R [2010] NSWCCA 236 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Kentwell v R [2014] HCA 37; 313 ALR 451 R v De Simoni [1981] HCA 31; 147 CLR 383 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Yet Toh Lay (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H Dhanji SC (Applicant) A Williams (Crown) Solicitors: Raymond Lee & Co (Applicant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2012/237247 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2013-11-14 00:00:00 Before: Zahra DCJ File Number(s): 2012/237247
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate