NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ritson v Secretary of Department of Justice and anor (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 1784 Hearing dates: Written submissions Decision date: 15 December 2014 Before: Bellew J Decision: 1.The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the first and second defendants as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: COSTS - whether costs should follow the event - whether the proceedings brought in the public interest Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Engadine Area Traffic Action Group Inc v Sutherland Shire Council (No 2) [2004] NSWLEC 434; (2004) 136 LGERA 365 Hastings Point Progress Association Inc v Tweed Shire Council (No 3) [2010] NSWCA 39 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) HCA 11; [1998] 193 CLR 72 Ritson v Secretary of Department of Justice and anor [2014] NSWSC 1651 Ritter v Godfrey [1920] 2 KB 47 Sunday Times Newspaper Co Limited v McIntosh (1933) 33 SR(NSW) 371; WN (NSW) 155 Trade Practices Commission v Nicholas Enterprises Pty Limited and ors [1979] FCA 143; (1979) 28 ALR 201 Category: Costs Parties: Brendan Ritson - Plaintiff Secretary of the Department of Justice - First defendant Attorney-General for the State of NSW - Second defendant Representation: Counsel: In person - Plaintiff Mr J Hutton - Defendants Solicitors: Crown Solicitor for NSW - Defendants File Number(s): 2014/78979 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate