NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hutchinson v R [2014] NSWCCA 317 Hearing dates: 19/09/2014 Decision date: 19 December 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Fullerton J at [2]; Adamson J at [40] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - supply prohibited drug - deal with proceeds of crime - whether sentence manifestly excessive - whether discount for assistance inadequate Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 193B(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 9, 23, 44 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5DA Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 25(2) Cases Cited: House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 LB v R [2013] NSWCCA 70 Piscitelli v R [2013] NSWCCA 8 R v Ehrlich [2012] NSWCCA 38; 219 A Crim R 415 R v Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220; 53 A Crim R 248 R v Perez-Vargas (1986) 8 NSWLR 559; 25 A Crim R 194 at 565 SZ v R [2007] NSWCCA 19; 168 A Crim R 249 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mitchell Joe Hutchinson (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: GD Wendler (Applicant) NJ Adams (Crown) Solicitors: Weller & Weller Solicitors (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2011/330553 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2013-08-07 00:00:00 Before: Wells DCJ File Number(s): 2011/330553
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate