NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Bugmy (No 2) [2014] NSWCCA 322 Hearing dates: 1 October 2014 Decision date: 19 December 2014 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Rothman J at [23] RA Hulme J at [106] Decision: Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal - Prosecution appeal against sentence - Remittal from High Court - Manifest inadequacy - Objective seriousness - Whether factor aggravating or mitigating - Subjective circumstances - Social deprivation -Aboriginal offender - Manifestly lenient - Error of law
CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal - Sentencing principles - Residual discretion not to intervene - Delay after plea - Imminent release on parole - Change in Crown position - Residual discretion exercised - Appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; (2012) 249 CLR 571 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) (Vic) v Karazisis [2010] VSCA 350; (2010) 206 A Crim R 14 Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; (2010) 205 A Crim R 1 Green v R; Quinn v R [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 CLR 462 Hili v R; Jones v R [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 Johnson v R [2004] HCA 15; (2004) 78 ALJR 616 Leung v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584 Mabo v Queensland (No 2) [1992] HCA 23; (1992) 175 CLR 1 Marbury v Madison (1803) 5 US 137 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 McCullough v R [2009] NSWCCA 94; (2009) 194 A Crim R 439 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 Munda v State of Western Australia [2013] HCA 38; (2013) 249 CLR 600 Nowak v R [2008] NSWCCA 89; (2008) 183 A Crim R 526 R v Bugmy [2012] NSWCCA 223 R v Carroll [2010] NSWCCA 55; (2010) 77 NSWLR 45 R v CMB [2014] NSWCCA 33 R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 R v JW [2010] NSWCCA 49; (2010) 77 NSWLR 7 R v Hayes (1987) 29 A Crim R 452 R v Kennedy [2013] NSWSC 1940 R v Lewis [2014] NSWSC 1127 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; (2006) 66 NSWLR 566 R v Rae [2013] NSWCCA 9 Veen v R (No 2) [1998] HCA 14; (1998) 164 CLR 465 Weininger v R [2003] HCA 14; (2003) 212 CLR 629 Wong v R [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Applicant) William Bugmy (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: NJ Adams (Applicant) P Strickland SC/with T Quilter (Respondent) Solicitors: Solicitor for Director of Public Prosecutions (Applicant) Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2011/16041 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-02-16 00:00:00 Before: Lerve ADCJ File Number(s): 2011/16041
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate