NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Jennar [2014] NSWCCA 331 Hearing dates: 1 December 2014 Decision date: 19 December 2014 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; McCallum J at [2]; R A Hulme J at [3] Decision: Crown appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeal against sentence - multiple armed robberies - shoot with intent to murder - significant objective seriousness - Court invited by Crown to view CCTV footage - waste of time - motive related to drug addiction - no error in concluding that crimes not motivated principally by greed - aggregate sentence - principle of totality - no utility in assessment of overall sentence in singling out one component and regarding balance as being referrable to remainder - sentence not manifestly inadequate Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; 249 CLR 571 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 R v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115; 195 A Crim R 38 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Applicant) Ryker Scott Jennar (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms V Lydiard (Crown) Ms A Francis (Respondent) Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions Legal Aid NSW File Number(s): 2011/381712 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2014-05-01 00:00:00 Before: Hanley SC DCJ File Number(s): 2011/381712
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate