NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Budrodeen v R [2014] NSWCCA 332 Hearing dates: 1 October 2014 Decision date: 01 October 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Rothman J at [2]; R A Hulme J at [13] Decision: Orders made 1 October 2014: 1. Leave to appeal against conviction granted and appeal allowed. 2. Convictions quashed. 3. Remit the matter to the District Court for further trial. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - sexual offences against 15 year-old complainant - fundamental error in jury directions relating to consent and honest and reasonable mistake of fact - care needed when jury directed in the form of a question trail Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes Amendment (Sexual Offences) Act 2003 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Rules Cases Cited: CTM v The Queen [2008] HCA 25; 236 CLR 440 He Kaw Teh v R [1985] HCA 43; (1985) 157 CLR 523 Proudman v Dayman [1941] HCA 28; 67 CLR 536 R v Reynhoudt [1962] HCA 23; (1962) 107 CLR 381 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Adam Budrodeen (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant (self-represented) Mr N Adams (Crown) Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2011/339339 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2013-08-23 00:00:00 Before: Hock DCJ File Number(s): 2011/339339
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate