NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Pavlou [2014] NSWCCA 337 Hearing dates: 29 September 2014 Decision date: 23 December 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Adams J at [2]; R A Hulme J at [33] Decision: Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - extent of accumulation - whether offender's involvement was under duress - whether sentence manifestly inadequate - objective seriousness of offence - comparable cases Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 44 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 25(2) Cases Cited: DAB v R; NJB v R [2010] NSWCCA 275 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120; 212 A Crim R 254 R v Choi [2010] NSWCCA 318 R v Glynatsis [2013] NSWCCA 131 R v Kazzi [2008] NSWCCA 77 R v MacDonnell [2002] NSWCA 34; 128 A Crim R 44 R v Opa [2004] NSWCCA 464 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NBSWLR 168 XX v R [2009] NSWCCA 115; 195 A Crim R 38 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Applicant) George Pavlou (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Girdham SC (Applicant) M Johnston (Respondent) Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Applicant) Nyman Gibson Stewart (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/387161 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2014-05-16 00:00:00 Before: Williams DCJ File Number(s): 2012/387161
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate