NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SB Two Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Council [2014] NSWLEC 1265 Hearing dates: 31 October 2014 Decision date: 24 December 2014 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Tuor C Decision: 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The development application (D/2014/250) for alterations and additions to the fourth (attic) level of the three approved dwellings at 27 Union Street, Balmain East, is refused. 3. The exhibits, except Exhibit 1, may be returned. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: alterations and additions to upper level of approved development. Request under cl 4.6 of Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan 2013 to vary floor space ratio control. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 - Development Standards Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan 2013 Cases Cited: Wehbe v Pittwater Council [2007] NSWLEC 827 Category: Principal judgment Parties: SB Two Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Leichhardt Council (Respondent) Representation: Ms S Duggan SC (Applicant) Mr V Conomos of Conomos Legal (Applicant)
Ms R McCulloch of Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 10507 of 2014
Judgment 1This is an appeal under s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the refusal by Leichhardt Council (council) of a development application (D/2014/250) for alterations and additions to the fourth (attic) level of the three approved dwellings at 27 Union Street, Balmain East (site). 2The key issue is whether the contravention of the floor space ratio (FSR) standard in cl 4.4 of Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan 2013 (the LEP) is acceptable and satisfies cl 4.6 of the LEP.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate