NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Millennium Design Consultants v The Hills Shire Council [2015] NSWLEC 1002 Hearing dates: 8 – 9 December 2014 Decision date: 14 January 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Morris C Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: Development application: boarding house, amalgamation of allotments, orderly and economic use of land, compatible with the character of the local area. Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979; State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009; Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979; The Hills Local Environmental Plan 2012; State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007; State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 – Design Quality of Residential Flat Development Cases Cited: The Hills Shire Council v Sales Search Pty Ltd [2013] NSWLEC 103; Zhang v Canterbury City Council [2001] NSWCA 167; Cornerstone Property Group Pty Ltd v Warringah Council[2004] NSWLEC 189; Karavellas v Sutherland Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 251; Thiessen Architects v Sutherland Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 480 Texts Cited: The Hills Development Control Plan 2012 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Millennium Design Consultants (Applicant)
The Hills Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr R O'Gorman Hughes (Applicant)
Mr M Staunton (Respondent)
Solicitors: Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent) File Number(s): 10290 of 2014
Judgment 1. Millennium Design Consultants (MDC) sought consent from The Hills Shire Council to construct a five storey, 25 room boarding house with basement carpark for 11 vehicles, at 269 Pennant Hills Road, Carlingford. The council refused consent on 6 May 2014 and MDC is appealing that decision. 2. The issues of the case are whether the application is consistent with the character of the local area; contributes towards the orderly and sustainable development of the local government area; complies with the relevant planning controls and the site is suitable for the proposed development.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate