NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: UGL Rail Pty Ltd v Wilkinson Murray Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 23 Hearing dates: 04 February 2015 Decision date: 06 February 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Ball J Decision: See paragraph 17 of this judgment Catchwords: COSTS – whether costs should be apportioned – whether interest should be awarded on costs – no issue of principle.
STAY – whether judgment should be stayed pending appeal – no evidence of hardship to defendant or inability of plaintiff to repay judgment – stay refused. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rule 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Gilfillan v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (No 2) (2013) 94 ACSR 543 Griffith v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 145 Kalifair Pty Ltd v Digi-Tech (Australia) Ltd [2002] NSWCA 383; (2002) 55 NSWLR 737 Lahoud v Lahoud [2006] NSWSC 126 Leda Pty Ltd v Weerden (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 283 McLaughlin v Dungowan Manly Pty Limited [2010] NSWSC 306 Macquarie International Health Clinic Pty Ltd v Sydney South West Area Health Service (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 171 Category: Costs Parties: UGL Rail Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Wilkinson Murray Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel:
MA Jones SC with Ms JA Steele (Plaintiff) RA Cavanagh SC (Defendant)
Solicitors:
DLA Piper (Plaintiff) Thompson Cooper Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2011/123652 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate