NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Martin v R [2015] NSWCCA 6 Hearing dates: 24 November 2014 Decision date: 10 February 2015 Before: Hidden J at [1] Price J at [2] Schmidt J at [63] Decision: 1. The extension of time to seek leave to appeal is granted. 2. Leave to appeal granted. 3. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – mental illness – whether principles applicable to an offender suffering mental illness correctly applied – whether error in not assessing moral culpability – whether sentence imposed by the judge was appropriate Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 95(1), 61J(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 3A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 6(3) Cases Cited: Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1998) 164 CLR 465 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; (2010) 273 ALR 324 R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 Ayshow v R [2011] NSWCCA 240 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 85 ALJR 1154 MDZ v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 243 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; (2014) 313 ALR 451 Dawson v R [2013] NSWCCA 61 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Trevor Leonard Martin (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Turnbull SC with S Pararajasingham (Applicant) P G Ingram SC (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate