NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Tuala [2015] NSWCCA 8 Hearing dates: 12 November 2014 Decision date: 13 February 2015 Before: Ward JA at [1]; Simpson J at [2]; Wilson J at [101] Decision: Crown appeal dismissed. Catchwords: APPEAL - sentencing - discharge of firearm with intent to cause grievous bodily harm - possession of prohibited and unregistered firearms - whether inadequate weight given to statutory maxima and non-parole periods - whether inadequate or excessive weight assigned to various sentencing considerations - attribution of weight assigned to primary judge - Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37
APPEAL - aggravating circumstances must be proved beyond reasonable doubt - use to be made of victim impact statements not subject to cross-examination - victim the subject of doubtful assessment of credibility - degree of injury, loss or harm not shown to be more substantial than ordinarily expected
CRIMINAL LAW - appeals - purpose of Crown appeals - Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49 - no principle sought to be established identified - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), Pt 3 Div 2, Pt 3 Div 3, Pt 4 Div 1A, s 21A, s 28, s 44(2) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 33A(1)(a) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW), s 7(1), s 36(1) Cases Cited: Aguirre v R [2010] NSWCCA 155 Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; 249 CLR 571 Elyard v R [2006] NSWCCA 43; 2006 45 MVR 402 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Miller v R [2014] NSWCCA 34 Ollis v R [2011] NSWCCA 155 R v Bain [2006] NSWCCA 79; 161 A Crim R 36 R v Berg [2004] NSWCCA 300 R v Deng [2007] NSWCCA 216; 176 A Crim R 1 R v DH; R v AH [2014] NSWCCA 326 R v King [2004] NSWCCA 444; 150 A Crim R 409 R v MJB [2014] NSWCCA 195 R v Muldoon (NSWCCA, 13 December 1990, unreported) R v Porter [2008] NSWCCA 145 R v RKB (NSWCCA, 30 June 1992, unreported) R v Slack [2004] NSWCCA 128 R v Thomas [2007] NSWCCA 269 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; 49 NSWLR 383 R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 R v Wilson [2005] NSWCCA 219 R v Youkhana [2004] NSWCCA 412 RP v R [2013] NSWCCA 192 Siganto v The Queen [1998] HCA 74; 194 CLR 656 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Applicant) Alvin Tuala (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Rowling (Applicant) B Clark/S Hartford Davis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate