NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rix v Mahony [2015] NSWSC 91 Hearing dates: 13 February 2015 Decision date: 13 February 2015 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: McDougall J Decision: Dismiss application for review of Registrar's decision Catchwords: PROCEDURE – review of Registrar's assessment of remuneration to be paid to trustees - where trustees had been appointed by court to sell property under s 66G of the Conveyancing Act - where plaintiff required to persuade reviewing court that order to set aside or vary Registrar's decision is in the interest of justice - where no evidence given that trustees' costs were excessive - where evidence justified remuneration sought Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Dae Boong International Co Pty Limited v Gray [2009] NSWCA 11 Rix v Mahony [2009] NSWSC 675 Rix v Mahony [2011] NSWSC 1308 Rix v Mahony [2012] NSWCA 241 Rix v Mahony (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 332 Rix v Mahony & Anor [2013] HCASL 47 Tomko v Palasty (No 2) (2007) 71 NSWLR 61 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Frederick George Rix (Plaintiff) Malcolm George Brown (First Defendant) Romano Di Donato (Second Defendant) Lisa Jane Mahony & Ors (Third Defendant) Representation: Solicitors: Frederick George Rix (Plaintiff) (In person) Ken Harkness (First and Second Defendants) Paul Wells (Third Defendant) File Number(s): 2008/280957
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate