NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: White v Johnston [2015] NSWCA 18 Hearing dates: 19 December 2014 Decision date: 18 February 2015 Before: Barrett JA at [1]; Emmett JA at [5]; Leeming JA at [20] Decision: 1. Appeal allowed.
2. Set aside the judgment and orders of the District Court dated 31 July 2013.
3. Remit the proceedings to the District Court for retrial, confined to the claim in negligence.
4. Order that Ms Johnston pay Ms White's costs of the appeal.
5. Grant a certificate under the Suitor's Fund Act 1951 (NSW) to Ms Johnston in respect of the costs of the appeal. Catchwords: ASSAULT AND BATTERY - dental treatment - whether patient's consent invalid because sole purpose was non-therapeutic - whether onus lay on patient or practitioner - whether absence of consent of the gist of assault and battery
DAMAGES - exemplary damages - whether Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 3B applied - requirement to determine compensatory damages before considering whether to order exemplary damages - whether other decisions comparable
EVIDENCE - tendency evidence - whether evidence of other malpractice by practitioner wrongly admitted - whether evidence able to be used for purpose different from that for which it was tendered - whether evidence of malpractice significantly probative of performing work with no therapeutic purpose
MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS - consent to treatment - whether consent to dental treatment invalid because of wholly non-therapeutic purpose - onus of proof Legislation Cited: Common Law Procedure Act 1852 (UK), s 80 Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 3B, 21 Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), s 36 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 94, 95, 97, 100, 140, 192 Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), s 37 Human Tissue Act 1983 (NSW), ss 19-20B Justices Act 1886 (Qld) Suitor's Fund Act 1951 (NSW) NSW Barristers' Rules, rr 60, 64 Cases Cited: Abrath v North Eastern Railway Co (1883) 11 QBD 440 Appleton v Garrett (1995) 34 BMLR 23; [1997] 8 Med LR 75 Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Global Gaming Supplies Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 21; 87 ALJR 668 Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2006] EWCA Civ 1085; [2007] 1 WLR 398 Astley v Austrust Ltd [1999] HCA 6; 197 CLR 1 Attorney-General (Vict) v The Commonwealth [1962] HCA 37; 107 CLR 529 Australian Financial Services and Leasing Pty Limited v Hills Industries Ltd [2014] HCA 14; 88 ALJR 552 Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd v The Queen [2012] HCA 14; 246 CLR 92 Banque Commerciale SA v Akhil Holdings Ltd [1990] HCA 11; 169 CLR 279 Barker v The Queen [1983] HCA 18; 153 CLR 338 Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; 60 CLR 336 Bryant v R [2011] NSWCCA 26; 205 A Crim R 531 Carr v Western Australia [2007] HCA 47; 232 CLR 138 Chakravarti v Advertiser Newspapers Ltd [1998] HCA 37; 193 CLR 519 Chan Wai Hung v Hong Kong Special Administrative Region [2000] HKCFA 99; 3 HKCFAR 288 Chapman v Chapman [1954] AC 429 Chatterton v Gerson [1981] QB 432 Christopherson v Bare (1848) 11 QB 473; 116 ER 554 Coulls v Bagot's Executor and Trustee Co Ltd [1967] HCA 3; 119 CLR 460 Cowell v Corrective Services Commission of New South Wales (1988) 13 NSWLR 714 Currie v Dempsey (1967) 69 SR (NSW) 116 Cusack v Stayt [2000] NSWCA 244; 31 MVR 517 Day v The Ocean Beach Hotel Shellharbour Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 250; 85 NSWLR 335 Dean v Phung [2012] NSWCA 223 Elomar v R [2014] NSWCCA 303 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22; 230 CLR 89 Ford v Ford 143 Mass 577 at 578 (1887) Freeman v Home Office (No 2) [1984] QB 524 Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 10; 56 NSWLR 298 Hart v Herron (1984) Aust Torts Reports 80-201 Henderson v Queensland [2014] HCA 52 Hunter and New England Area Health Service v A [2009] NSWSC 761; 74 NSWLR 88 Johnston v Dr Jasmin White's Dental Surgery Pty Ltd (in liq) [2013] NSWDC 127 Kavanagh v Gudge (1844) 7 Man & G 316; 135 ER 132 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 11; 243 CLR 361 Kuru v State of New South Wales [2008] HCA 26; 236 CLR 1 McNamara v Duncan (1971) 26 ALR 584 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd [1992] HCA 66; 67 ALJR 170 New South Wales v Radford [2010] NSWCA 276; 79 NSWLR 327 Papadimitropoulos v The Queen [1957] HCA 74; 98 CLR 249 Plenty v Dillon [1991] HCA 5; 171 CLR 635 R v AH (1997) 42 NSWLR 702 R v Brown [1992] 2 UKHL 7; [1994] AC 212 R v C, M [2014] SASCFC 116 R v Clarence (1888) 22 QBD 23 R v Court [1989] AC 28 R v Donovan [1934] 2 KB 498 R v Harkin (1989) 38 A Crim R 296 R v Jheeta [2007] EWCA Crim 1699; [2008] 1 WLR 2582 R v Jones [2011] QCA 19; 209 A Crim R 379 R v Lynch (1930) 30 SR NSW 420 R v Mobilio [1991] 1 VR 339 R v Tabassum [2000] EWCA Crim 90; [2000] 2 Cr App R 328 R v Williams [1923] 1 KB 340 R v Zhang [2005] NSWCCA 437; 158 A Crim R 504 Reeves v The Queen [2013] HCA 57; 88 ALJR 215 Reibl v Hughes (1978) 89 DLR (3d) 112 Reibl v Hughes [1980] 2 SCR 880; 114 DLR (3d) 1 Rogers v Whitaker [1992] HCA 58; 175 CLR 479 Rosenberg v Percival [2001] HCA 18; 205 CLR 434 Sanpine v Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council [2005] NSWSC 365 Scott v Davis [2000] HCA 52; 204 CLR 333 Secretary, Department of Health & Community Services v JWB and SMB (Marion's case) [1992] HCA 15; 175 CLR 218 Sibley v Milutinovic (1990) Aust Torts Reports 81-013 Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital [1984] QB 493 State of New South Wales v Hunt [2014] NSWCA 47; 86 NSWLR 226 State of New South Wales v Ibbett [2005] NSWCA 445; 65 NSWLR 168 State of New South Wales v Zreika [2012] NSWCA 37 TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Anning [2002] NSWCA 82; 54 NSWLR 333 Velkoski v The Queen [2014] VSCA 121 Wallaby Grip Limited v QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd [2010] HCA 9; 240 CLR 444 Wood v Manley (1839) 11 Ad & E 34; 113 ER 325 X v The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network [2013] NSWCA 320 XL Petroleum (NSW) Pty Ltd v Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 12; 155 CLR 448 Texts Cited: J B Ames, Select Cases on Torts (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1874) S K N Blay, "Onus of Proof of Consent in an Action for Trespass to the Person" (1987) 61 ALJ 25 E Bullen and S Leake, Precedents of Pleadings in Personal Actions in the Superior Courts of Common Law (Stevens and Sons, 3rd ed, 1868) J Devereux, "When practising fails to make perfect: Medical treatment and battery" (2013) 21 Tort Law Review 120 J Fleming, The Law of Torts (LBC Information Services, 9th ed, 1998 and 10th ed, 2011) J Goudkamp, Tort Law Defences (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2013) Halsbury's Laws of England (Butterworth & Co, 1st ed, 1913 and 5th ed, 2010) R Hardcastle, Law and the Human Body (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2007) J D Heydon, Cross on Evidence (LexisNexis, 10th Aust ed, 2015) W S Holdsworth, "The New Rules of Pleading of the Hilary Term, 1834" (1923) 1 CLJ 261 M Jones, Medical Negligence (Sweet & Maxwell, 4th ed 2008) W Keeton et al, Prosser and Keeton on Torts (West Publishing Co, 5th ed, 1984) I Kerridge, M Lowe and C Stewart, Ethics and law for the health professions (Federation Press, 4th ed, 2013) S McLeish, "Challenges to the Survival of the Common Law" (2014) 38(2) Melbourne University Law Review (Advance) P Polden, "The New Pleading Rules of Hilary Term 1834" in Oxford History of English Law, vol XI F Pollock, The Law of Torts (Stevens and Sons Ltd, 5th ed, 1897; and 12th ed, 1923) J Raz, Between Authority and Interpretation (Oxford University Press, 2009) A Robins and M Holland, "The enigmatic illness and death of Constance, wife of Oscar Wilde" (2015) 385 The Lancet 21 J Spigelman, "Negligence: The Last Outpost of the Welfare State" (2002) 76 ALJ 432 Professor F A Trindade, "Intentional Torts: Some thoughts on Assault and Battery" (1982) 2 OJLS 211 P Underwood, "Is Ms Donoghue's Snail in Mortal Peril?" (2004) 12 Torts Law Journal 39 D Villa, Annotated Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) (Lawbook Co, 2nd ed, 2013) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jasmin White (Appellant) Ruth Johnston (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Phillips (Appellant) M Thompson (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate