NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Veness v Hodge [2015] NSWCA 20 Hearing dates: 12 December 2014 Date of orders: 23 February 2015 Decision date: 23 February 2015 Before: Barrett JA at [1]; Emmett JA at [2]; Adamson J at [58] Decision: Summons filed on 2 July 2014 be dismissed with costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – whether the primary judge erred in construing and applying the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), s 19, in making an apprehended personal violence order – whether the primary judge misconceived the object of the Act – whether the primary judge failed to provide adequate reasons Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 18 Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), ss 4, 7, 8, 10, 18, 19, 20, 35, 36, 84 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Illawarra Cashmart Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 343; 67 NSWLR 402 Kirk v Industrial Court of NSW [2010] HCA 1; 239 CLR 531 Mahmoud v Sutherland [2012] NSWCA 306 PE v MU [2010] NSWDC 2 Robbins v Commissioner of Taxation (1974) 129 CLR 332 Wende v Horwath (NSW) Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 170 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Suzanne Veness (Applicant) Judith Marguerite Hodge (First Respondent) District Court of NSW (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Robinson SC with P Glissan (Applicant) S Walsh (First Respondent) Submitting appearance (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate