NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: BMA and BMB v Department of Family and Community Services [2015] NSWCATAD 20 Hearing dates: 7 January, 4 and 11 February 2015 Decision date: 19 February 2015 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Higgins, Principal Member Professor P Foreman, General Member Decision: 1. The decision of the respondent to de-authorise the applicants as authorised carers is set aside.
2. The decision of the respondent to remove the child from the applicants' day-to-day care is affirmed.
3. Pursuant to subsection 32(2) of the Community Services (Complaints, Reviews and Monitoring) Act 1993 the Tribunal recommends:
(a) Responsibility for the overall management of the placement of the child be transferred to the Albury offices of the respondent, and
(b) Immediate steps be taken to facilitate contact, including unsupervised overnight contact, between the child and the applicants.
4. In regard to the applicants' application for costs the following directions are made:
(a) On or before 20 February 2015, the applicant to file and serve their written submissions on costs, including the amount of costs sought.
(b) On or before 6 March 2015, the respondent to file and serve its written submissions in reply.
(c )The applicants' application for costs to be determined on the papers. Catchwords: Administrative review – review of decision to remove a child from the day-to-day care of his grandparents
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate