NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Re Estate Ford; Application for Executor's Commission [2016] NSWSC 6 Hearing dates: On written submissions in chambers Date of orders: 27 January 2016 Decision date: 27 January 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Probate List Before: Lindsay J Decision: (1) Order that, save for an agreed adjustment, an application for review of a deputy registrar's determination of an allowance for executor's commission, and costs, out of a deceased estate be dismissed.
(2) Order that the executor pay the costs of the application for review without recourse to, or an indemnity from, the estate. Catchwords: WILLS, PROBATE and ADMINISTRATION – Executors – Claim for Commission – Assessment of Quantum – Principles applicable – small, uncomplicated estate.
PROCEDURE – Review of Registrar's decision – Assessment of executor's commission – Nature of review – Status of registrar's decision – Summary procedure.
COSTS – Wills, Probate and administration – Executor's claim for commission – Costs on application for commission – Costs on application for review – Principles applicable. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 NSW, section 13 Probate and Administration Act 1898 NSW Supreme Court Delegation SCDEL 10 Part 1 Supreme Court Rules 1970 NSW, part 78 rule 94 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 NSW Cases Cited: Allen v Union-Fidelity Trustee Co of Australia Ltd (1986) 6 NSWLR 341 at 345E-346D Bates v Messner (1967) 67 SR (NSW) 187 at 189 and 191-192 Boyce v Bunce [2015] NSWSC 1924 at [45] Creer-the Estate of Peters [2007] NSWSC 1291 at [9] Ford v Princehorn; Estate of Ford [2012] NSWSC 1165 Hawkins v Barkley-Brown & Anor [2010] NSWSC 48 at [68]-[69] In the goods of Loveday [1900] P 154 at 156 In the Will of Shannon [1977) 1 NSWLR 210 at 214G-215D In the Will of Sheppard [1972] 2 NSWLR 714 at 716G-717B Nissen v Grunden (1912) 14 CLR 297 at 304-305. Re Estate Gowing at [29] and [100]-[108] Robinson v Pett (1734) 3P WMS. 249; 24 ER 1049 Tonko v Plasty (No. 2) (2008) 71 NSWLR 61 at 64 [4]-65 [11] Williamson v Spelleken [1977] Qd R 152 Texts Cited: ES Vance, Executors Commission (Law Book Co, Australia, 1969), pages 187-190 Mason and Handler, Succession Law and Practice (NSW) (Lexis Nexis, looseleaf), paragraph [1441.18] RS Geddes, CJ Rowland and P Studdert, Wills, Probate and Administration Law in New South Wales (LBC Information Services, 1996), paragraph [86.29] Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Geoffrey Alan Princehorn Defendants: Ian James Ford, Stewart John Ford, Narelle Winnetta Lauer, Beverley Ann Fewins, Winnetta Mavis Ford, Susan Mary Stanley, Craig James Ford and Douglas Alan Ford Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: JL Poole (solicitor) Defendants: JE Armfield
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate