NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kamil Faltas v Hong Peng; Tammy Westbury v Hong Peng; Bianca Faltas v Hong Peng; Emile Faltas v Hong Peng [2014] NSWSC 1922 Hearing dates: Monday, 27 October 2014 Date of orders: 27 October 2014 Decision date: 27 October 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Brereton J Decision: Beneficiaries' to each receive legacies in the estate Catchwords: SUCCESSION – family provision – approval of settlement – where approval sought of party who has not obtained independent advice – whether independent advice is prerequisite for approval – held, it is not Legislation Cited: (NSW) Succession Act 2006, s 95 Category: Principal judgment Parties: In 2012/331344: Kamil Faltas (plaintiff) Hong Peng (defendant)
In 2012/187785: Emile Faltas (plaintiff) Hong Peng (defendant)
In 2012/334268: Tammy Westbury (plaintiff) Hong Peng (defendant)
In 2012/336473 Bianca Faltas (plaintiff) Hong Peng (defendant) Representation: Counsel: In 2012/331344: J Armfield (plaintiff) M Gorrick (defendant)
In 2012/187785: A G Rogers (plaintiff) M Gorrick (defendant)
In 2012/334268: Tammy Westbury (no counsel) M Gorrick (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate