NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Monhem v Shields [2015] NSWCA 24 Hearing dates: 18 February 2015 Decision date: 18 February 2015 Before: Basten JA; Ward JA; Leeming JA Decision: Dismiss the application for leave to appeal, with no order as to costs. Catchwords: APPEAL – application for leave to appeal – failure of applicants to attend hearing before Land and Environment Court – refusal of judge to reopen final orders – appeal limited to errors of law – arguable error of approach – case presented before primary judge not shown to justify reopening
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to reopen final orders – party served with originating process failed to attend hearing – no satisfactory explanation for non-attendance – whether material supported different outcome – orders partly effected – prejudice to other party Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), ss 56A, 57 Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 36.16 Cases Cited: Allesch v Maunz [2000] HCA 40; 203 CLR 172 Double Bay Newspapers v The Fitness Lounge [2006] NSWSC 226 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mansour Monhem (First Applicant) Houda Monhem (Second Applicant) Ranald Shields (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H Altan (Applicants) Submitting appearance (Respondent)
Solicitors: Cordato Partners Lawyers (Applicants) Houston Dearn O'Connor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/214636 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Land and Environment Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Class 2 Citation: [2014] NSWLEC 99 Date of Decision: 18 July 2014 File Number(s): 2014/20160
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate