NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ferris v Atherton (No 2) [2014] NSWDC 273 Hearing dates: 27 May 2014 Decision date: 27 May 2014 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Cogswell SC DCJ Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) The respondent's application for costs is dismissed. (3) Each party is to pay their own costs of the appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application for apprehended personal violence order – question of test to be applied - not frivolous or vexatious - not without substance - respondent's application dismissed pursuant to s99(3) of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 – weighing of various discretions and considerations - if application found to be frivolous or vexatious, applicant to pay one third of the respondent's costs Legislation Cited: Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007, ss 99(2), 99(3) Criminal Procedure Act 1986, s 213(1) Cases Cited: Cunningham v Cunningham [2012] NSWSC 849 Garde v Dowd [2011] NSWCA115 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 Mahmoud v Sutherland [2012] NSWCA 306 Mahmoud v Sutherland [2013] NSWDC 140 Ohn v Walton (1995) 36 NSWLR 77 Category: Costs Parties: Peter James Ferris (applicant) Jed Atherton (respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Brennan (applicant) B Rosic (respondent) File Number(s): 2013/00151082 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Local Court, Downing Centre Date of Decision: 28 October 2013 Before: Stapleton LCM File Number(s): 2013/00151082
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate