NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: El Sayed v El Hawach [2015] NSWCA 26 Hearing dates: 10 February 2015 Decision date: 26 February 2015 Before: Beazley P; Gleeson JA; Leeming JA Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed.
2. Cross-appeal allowed.
3. Order 6 made on 20 December 2013 be set aside.
4. Vary order 7 made on 20 December 2013 by deleting the word "otherwise".
5. Vary order 8 made on 20 December 2013 by deleting the words "75% of".
6. Order that the appellants/cross-respondents pay the costs of the respondents/cross-appellants of the appeal and cross-appeal. Catchwords: TRUSTS AND TRUSTEES - "discretionary trust" - appointor purported to exercise powers inconsistently - standing - whether eligible beneficiaries of discretionary trust had standing to bring derivative action - where proceedings had been brought against eligible beneficiaries - where eligible beneficiaries claimed to have become trustee and appointor - whether special circumstances established - eligible beneficiaries had standing
TRUSTS AND TRUSTEES - fiduciary duties - whether purported appointment of eligible beneficiary who acted as trustee's solicitor as appointor a breach of duty - obligation to consider scope of fiduciary obligations - no breach established Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75 Cases Cited: Alexander v Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd [2004] HCA 7; 216 CLR 109 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Carey [No 6] [2006] FCA 814; 153 FCR 509 Barescape Pty Limited as trustee for The V's Family Trust & Anor v Bacchus Holdings Pty Limited as trustee for The Bacchus Holdings Trust & Anor (No 9) [2012] NSWSC 984 Beach Petroleum NL v Kennedy [1999] NSWCA 408; 48 NSWLR 1 Boulting v Association of Cinematograph, Television and Allied Technicians [1963] 2 QB 606 Bray v Ford [1896] AC 44 Chief Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) v Buckle [1998] HCA 4; 192 CLR 226 Deutsch v Deutsch [2012] VSC 227; 6 ASTLR 386 Ex parte Hebburn; Re Kearsley Shire Council (1947) 47 SR (NSW) 416 Highland v Labraga (No 2) [2005] NSWSC 1212 In re Coomber; Coomber v Coomber [1911] 1 Ch 723 In re Skeats' Settlement (1889) 42 Ch D 522 In the Matter of X (Trust) [2012] JRC 171 Kearns v Hill (1990) 21 NSWLR 107 Lewis v Condon [2013] NSWCA 204; 85 NSWLR 99 Pearson v Commissioner of Taxation [2001] FCA 1427; 116 FCR 357 Rigg v Sheridan [2008] NSWCA 79 Sharpe v San Paulo Railway Company (1873) LR 8 Ch App 597 Warman International Ltd v Dwyer [1995] HCA 18; 182 CLR 544 Texts Cited: P Finn, Fiduciary Obligations Law Book Company, 1977 G Thomas and A Hudson, The Law of Trusts Oxford University Press, 2nd ed, 2010 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Khaled El Sayed (1st Appellant and 1st Cross-Respondent) M E Asset Investments Pty Ltd (2nd Appellant and 2nd Cross-Respondent) Sayed El Hawach (1st Respondent and 1st Cross-Appellant) Victoria Lahoud (2nd Respondent and 2nd Cross-Appellant) Brady Street Developments Pty Ltd (3rd Respondent) Representation: Counsel: W Chan (Appellants and Cross-Respondents) R Horsley (Respondents and Cross-Appellants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate