NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Clarke v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 27 Hearing dates: 3 February 2015 Date of orders: 24 February 2015 Decision date: 24 February 2015 Before: McColl JA; Ward JA Decision: Summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: APPEAL – application for leave to appeal – interlocutory decisions – no prospects of success - leave refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) Law Enforcement (Power and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: AB v State of New South Wales [2014] NSWCA 243 Carolan v AMF Bowling Pty Ltd t/as Bennetts Green Bowl [1995] NSWCA 69 Clarke, Dallas v State of New South Wales [2013] NSWSC 1436 Clarke, Dallas v State of New South Wales (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 578 Clarke, Dallas v State of New South Wales (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 593 Collier v Lancer (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 186 Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Ltd [2006] HCA 55; (2006) 229 CLR 577 Dank v Cronulla Sutherland District Rugby League Football Club Ltd [2014] NSWCA 288 Dietrich v The Queen [1992] HCA 57; (1992) 177 CLR 292 El-Saeidy v NSW Land & Housing Corporation [2014] NSWCA 172 Fingleton v The Queen [2005] HCA 34; (2005) 227 CLR 166 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Itek Graphix Limited v Elliot [2002] NSWCA 104; (2002) 54 NSWLR 207 Jaycar Pty Limited v Lombardo [2011] NSWCA 284 Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48; (2000) 201 CLR 488 Macatangay v State of New South Wales (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 272 Micallef v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 274 Reid v Commercial Club (Albury) Ltd [2014] NSWCA 98 Williams v Director General of the National Parks & Wildlife Services [2002] NSWCA 176 Young v Hones (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 338 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dallas Clarke (Applicant) State of New South Wales (First Respondent) Magistrate Swain (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr Clarke (Applicant in person) Mr Richard Lee (First and Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate