NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Eriyo v R [2015] NSWCCA 16 Hearing dates: 16 February 2015 Date of orders: 03 March 2015 Decision date: 03 March 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Johnson J at [2] Davies J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal allowed. 3. Quash the sentences imposed in the District Court on 28 February 2014. 4. In lieu thereof sentence the Applicant as follows:
Count 1: Imprisonment for six years commencing 6 February 2014 and expiring 5 February 2020; Count 2: Imprisonment for six years commencing 6 December 2014 and expiring 5 December 2020;
Fix a non-parole period of four years ten months commencing 6 February 2014 and expiring 5 December 2018. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – importing drugs – sentencing – two offences – judge imposes non-parole period for each offence – whether overall non-parole period manifestly excessive – whether a normal range for ratio of non-parole period to overall sentence – use of comparative cases Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alvares v R; Farache v R [2011] NSWCCA 33; (2011) 209 A Crim R 297 Briouzguine v R [2014] NSWCCA 264 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 MLP v R [2014] NSWCCA 183 Okeke v R [2010] NSWCCA 266 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Etinosa Eriyo (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Doyle (Applicant) T D Anderson (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate