NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wilde v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 28 Hearing dates: 3 February 2015 Date of orders: 26 February 2015 Decision date: 26 February 2015 Before: Beazley P; McColl JA; Ward JA Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – where appellant has served sentence – where appellant has extensive criminal history for serious sexual assault offences – where appellant is a "high risk sex offender" for the purposes of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), s 5B
HIGH RISK SEX OFFENDER – application for extended supervision order pursuant to the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) s 9(1)(a) – appeal – no error in the exercise of discretion
HIGH RISK SEX OFFENDER – conditions of supervision order imposed pursuant to Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), s 11 – correct test for imposition of conditions – link between condition and risk of future offending
HIGH RISK SEX OFFENDER – conditions of supervision order imposed pursuant to Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), s 11 – correct test for imposition of conditions – role of onerous or punitive nature of condition
HIGH RISK SEX OFFENDER – application for extended supervision order – imposition of conditions related to consumption of alcohol and illicit drugs Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Amendment Act 2014 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney General for New South Wales v Tillman [2008] NSWSC 1293 Attorney-General for New South Wales v Tillman [2007] NSWCA 119 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 State of New South Wales v Ali [2010] NSWSC 1045 State of New South Wales v Boatswain [2014] NSWSC 1446 State of New South Wales v Burns [2014] NSWSC 1014 State of New South Wales v Fisk [2013] NSWSC 364 State of New South Wales v Green (Final) [2013] NSWSC 1003 State of New South Wales v Hill [2014] NSWSC 1803 State of New South Wales v Stevenson [2013] NSWSC 1070 Winters v Attorney-General for NSW [2008] NSWCA 33 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Alan Wilde (Appellant) State of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Pararajasingham (Appellant) G F Mahony (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate