NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: De Wet v R [2015] NSWCCA 23 Hearing dates: 25 February 2015 Decision date: 11 March 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Harrison J at [2]; R A Hulme J at [30]. Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – appeal against sentence – kidnapping committed in company – grievous bodily harm – consideration and practical effect given to s3A of the Crimes Sentencing Procedure Act 1999 by trial judge – sentences are not unreasonable or plainly unjust Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedures) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Dinsdale v the Queen (2000) 175 ALR 315 Franklin v R [2013] NSWCCA 122 Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45 at [59] House v The King [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 R v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115; (2009) 195 A Crim R 38 Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Simon Peter De Wet (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Hancock (Applicant) JA Girdham SC (Respondent)
Solicitors: Brock Partners (Applicant) Solicitor of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/252124 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Date of Decision: 30 April 2014 Before: Conlon DCJ File Number(s): 2012/252124
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate