NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: ML v R [2015] NSWCCA 27 Hearing dates: 16 February 2015 Decision date: 05 March 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Johnson J at [72] Davies J at [73] Decision: Leave granted to the appellant to rely upon Ground 2 of the appeal. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal – sexual intercourse and attempted sexual intercourse with child under 10 years – appellant convicted of attempt offence but acquitted of sexual intercourse offence – whether jury verdicts were factually inconsistent and unreasonable – whether "unreliable evidence" warning should have been given with respect to the evidence of the complainant – no factual inconsistency between verdicts – no need for warning under s165 of the Evidence Act 1999 – no miscarriage of justice. Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 – r 4 Evidence Act 1999 Cases Cited: MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53; 213 CLR 606 R v DBG [2002] NSWCCA 328; 133 A Crim R 227 R v TK [2009] NSWCCA 151; 74 NSWLR 299 Category: Principal judgment Parties: ML – Appellant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: S Odgers SC - Appellant G O'Rourke – Respondent Crown
Solicitors: SE O'Connor – Legal Aid NSW - Appellant Solicitor for Public Prosecutions – Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2011/185228 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 29 November 2013 Before: Payne DCJ File Number(s): 2011/185228
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate