NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Smythe v Burgman [2015] NSWSC 150 Hearing dates: 3 March 2015 Date of orders: 03 March 2015 Decision date: 05 March 2015 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL Decision: (1) The plaintiff's motion to vacate the hearing date is refused. (2) The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the application before me on 3 March 2015. (3) I direct that the plaintiff is to file and serve an evidentiary statement restricted to the issue of liability by 1pm on Friday, 6 March 2015. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to vacate hearing date – complex medical negligence matter – application to vacate brought 2 ½ weeks before hearing date – change of solicitor with new solicitors wishing to re-instate a claim previously abandoned – ss 56-58 of Civil Procedure Act 2005 – application to vacate hearing date refused. Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 – s5D(2) Civil Procedure Act 2005 – ss56 - 58 Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; 239 CLR 175 King v Western Sydney Local Health Network [2013] NSWCA 162 Strong v Woolworths Ltd [2012] HCA 5; 246 CLR 182 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Lynne Smythe – Plaintiff Dr Zoe Burgman – Defendant Representation: Counsel: Mr I D Roberts SC – Plaintiff Mr M Windsor SC – Defendant
Solicitors: Monaco Solicitors – Plaintiff Holman Webb Lawyers – Defendant File Number(s): 2012/370062
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate