NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Magur v Brydon [2014] NSWSC 1931 Hearing dates: 25 September 2014 Date of orders: 05 December 2014 Decision date: 05 December 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Robb J Decision: (1) Proposed orders are as set out in par 153.
(2) Date to be fixed to deal with the issue of costs. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – family provision and maintenance – failure by testator to make sufficient provision for applicant – applicant and deceased estranged – formerly loving relationship – applicant provided assistance in deceased's business – applicant not responsible for estrangement – costs of proceedings – where amount of costs incurred forms an unusual proportion of the value of the estate – attitude of Court Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56(1), 99 Succession Act 2006 (NSW) ss 3, 57(1)(c), 58(2), 59, 60(2) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alexander v Jansson [2010] NSWCA Aubrey v Kain [2014] NSWSC 15 Blore v Lang (1960) 104 CLR 124 Butler v Morris [2012] NSWSC 748 Grundel v Registrar-General (1990) 5 BPR 11,217 Keep v Bourke [2012] NSWCA 64 McCosker v McCosker (1957) 97 CLR 566 Pang v Fong [2014] NSWSC 1425 Raiola v Raiola [2014] NSWSC 967 Singer v Berghouse [1994] HCA 40; (1994) 181 CLR 20 Underwood v Gaudron [2014] NSWSC 1055 West v Mann [2013] NSWSC 1852 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Daria Magur (plaintiff) Andrew Daniel Brydon (defendant) Representation: Counsel: R Colquhoun (plaintiff) A Paterson (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate